SS14. On other pages: part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4.
simpl speling March 2001 part 5 members' supplement.
Helping the SSS in seeking 'critical mass'.
JACK BOVILL outlines his aims for the presentation he made to the
committee in January. A report on the presentation appears below.
My aim was to present, interactively with those present, two features:
A: Whatever is the SSS's final view of simplifying spelling will
receive my support thruout the process of implementation.
B: Implementation is on a gradual (ie, every year) basis of the three
(or thereabouts) most important simplifications which have a fonetic
basis.
I suggested there were barriers to this and invited suggestions,
adding mine as we went.
I suggested that for every barrier, there is an opposite, a driver for change. We
listed these and then prioritized them in order of influence.
We had then mapped out the areas of influence that affect the outcome of a
simplifying spelling campaign. It may seem a gigantic task. However, in my
experience, there is a thing called 'critical mass at which point the switch takes
place from, 'no this cannot be done' to 'this is the thing to do'. Decimalization is
an example.
To achieve critical mass requires knowing where to apply
one's energy. Without mapping the barriers to change and the drivers to change,
we are at risk of not proceeding at all.
My suggestion to the committee was we invite all members to
target the various areas listed both as barriers and complementary drivers,
allocating to themselves one area on which they could seek guidance from me on
how to go about their future work, with me always reporting to the committee on
what advice I am giving as they go along.
I do not expect many members to join an active group. Small
societies such as ours usually depend on the committee to do the work, while
taking an interest in progress.
There will need to be easy commununication, hence only those
on email should put themselves forward. The groups need to be small - no more
than four or five. They each need to know what success looks like and what the
milestones on the way look like. They need only report back on two things:
stasis (inactivity) and milestones achieved. In the position of stasis, they
need help to move on; milestones mean they are getting somewhere.
At some point, critical mass will emerge. At this stage. the
committee should have agreed on most of its recommendations, as these will be
copyrightable and therefore of monetary value.
Forming a strategy for introducing simplified spelling.
[An edited report of Jack Bovill's presentation
to committee members at their January meeting]
Jack began his presentation with an example
of change in the commercial aircraft industry, where all the critical aspects
had to come together before success was achieved. Was the same true of spelling
change, and what were the critical aspects likely to be?
He said he felt the Society needed a strategy, and quoted John Reilly's final words
in an article in JSSS 28:
'all that is lacking is a strategy'.
Using a board, and yellow and pink Post-it notes and marker
pens, he invited committee members to brainstorm the Barriers to introducing
simplified spelling. That brainstorm completed. he asked the participants to
call out in a similar manner the Drivers for change. those aspects that would
help introduce spelling reform. When that was finished he suggested that the
opposite of the Barriers were the same or similar Drivers for change.
Using all the Post-it notes, members were invited to group
the notes as best they could by connected themes or words. duplicating where
required. After this, the committee gave each group a Heading, which was
written on a master sheet and circled. Jack asked which group influenced which
other group. and a line and arrowhead was drawn showing the connection. Each
Heading then exhibited a number of lines of influence, either going out or
coming in. These were prioritized according to the Heading which gave the
highest influence down to the one most influenced. The result came as some
surprise to all present as the priority became clear.
Committee members found that the area of highest influence
was Cost - saving of, and the least influential, was Authorities. The
complete list was: Cost 5/0, Communicating 4/1, Benefits 2/3,
Awareness/Education 2/3, International 2/3, and Authorities
0/5, where the first figure is the number of influences affecting other areas, and
the second figure shows the times this area is influenced by other areas.
At this stage Chris Upward pointed out that greater definition was required. It was
noted that Cost was in the sense of saving and Communicating was in the sense of
media of various kinds.
Jack proposed that the committee register their support for
two, possibly three, subgroups of members who select themselves, but who must
be on email to facilitate communication between themselves and the committee.
These groups would work on the top two or three Headings and be assisted by
Jack to work on each of their sub-categories. They would use the committee
brainstorm notes as a starting point. looking for ways to affect areas within
their sferes of influence and reporting back on what works and what appears not
to work. There would be a number of rules to assist them.
They would develop greater definition. moving the number of
high-level abstractions of the committee work and their own work down to 'what
does this mean in practise?'.
Jack closed by referring to the five critical developments
that had resulted in the successful start of economically and aerodynamically
safe commercial aircraft. What might be the necessary critical developments
needed to bring about simplified spelling'? The internet? The higher awareness
of the costs of not implementing it? Having a strategy'? By involving the
membership. might we be adding a critical development?
The committee endorsed Jack's proposals, and he is now
working with Jean Hutchins and Allan Campbell both to report back to the
membership and also to assist in setting up the subgroups, each of no more than
five people with a close interest in the Heading, with a reserve sixth member. The
time frame for the groups is not more than one year. There would be a review
six months after they became active.
The review was to see if progress had been made, both at subgroup level and at
Society level. For this to happen, at each level markers would need to be put down
which were considered to represent progress: Membership levels and membership
inquiries would be two relevant measurements at Society level. Being asked to speak
at a local level by interested parties could be a measurement for the subgroups. It
was too early to say what measurements would be decided on. The leader of each
subgroup would liaise with Jack for help, with Jack reporting to the committee on
all aspects of his work with the subgroups.
The full list of Drivers follows, with an asterisk
indicating the following ones which were originally Barriers to the
introduction of simplified spelling.
Cost - saving.
Economy of effort, Learner time. User time. Economics. Economy of space and money. *
User advantages (disbenefits), Long-term reduction in cost (short-term cost).
Communicating.
Newspapers, Computers. Text messaging, Global communications. Emails, *Sales -
advantages for publishers - profits for publishers (implications for publishing),
Official bodies (Hansard). Computers require more accurate spelling - search engines
(computer spelling will make it irrelevant).
Benefits.
Literacy problems, Collapse of present system. Higher potential rates of literacy.
Faster literacy acquisition, *Reform will also be part of English uniqueness
(spelling is part of English uniqueness), Learning present spelling confuses the
mind (learning present spelling is good training for the mind), Caring about
children now makes it easier for the next generation (selfishness - `we had to learn
to spell'), Parents are keen for children to be literate earlier (parents are not
able to help children with spelling).
Awareness, information, education.
Laziness, Mobilized SSS membership, Public awareness, *Appreciate change (fear of
change), Readiness to modernize - the future (break with the past), Present options
and a sensible scheme (lack of a sensible scheme), Inclusive change (not invented
here), Public support and understanding (public prejudice), Public awareness (public
ignorance), Being aware of the difficulties of spelling (ignorance of the
difficulties of spelling), Emotional commitment (evidence and data), Public
enthusiasm (public apathy).
International.
International body for science and vocabulary, etc, Reforms in other languages,
Anglo-American differences. Greater worldwide use of English. *Unification and
preservation of international language (fragmentation of international language),
Compromise (fear of different orthografy for dialects), Presenting English as a
world language - empire (international implications).
Authorities.
Dictionaries, Fashion, Somebody famous recommending it, If NZ did it and it worked,
Appointment of a body (eg, Academie Frangaise), International body for science,
vocabulary, etc. *University support (exam bodies), Electronic dictionaries
(dictionaries). Government need to raise literacy standards (governmental fear of
upsetting the status quo), Political will (lack of political will), Seducing the
relevant authority (persuading the relevant authority).
Comment (by Jack): While the above brainstorm made a lot of
sense to the participants, the results may not be immediately comprehensible to
anyone else. These categories can be expanded with other examples and unpicked
by those working on the relevant subcommittee.
Postscript: I would like it noted that the work I suggest should be done in
the context of 'Standard English' as this eliminates controversy over dialects. Standard English is a kind of convenient fiction and is therefore useful.
Implementation.
Members who are interested in participating in developing one of the top three
Headings - 1 Cost, the savings. 2 Communicating, media of various kinds, 3 Benefits
- and leaving read the brainstormed results, should email Jean Hutchins. Because we
wish to run this pilot with five members per team only and with a back-up sixth
member, can u let Jean know your first, second, and final preference'? This will
enable us to sort out teams. U should include your fone number, so that the
individual details can be discussed with me. I will report back to Jean.
The following series of questions should help to indicate
your suitability to join a team.
1. Do u enjoy the idea of expanding the ground work on
introducing spelling reform, affecting:
a) The Costs, the saving of the same, or
b) Communicating, media of various kinds, or
c) The Benefits of introducing spelling reforms?
2. In which order would u rate your interest?
3. Do u have email?
4. Would u feel comfortable being part of a team, whom u may
never see, but with whom u are in regular contact on a subject of common
interest?
5. Can u undertake to report back on limited assignments
that test the validity or otherwise of ideas generated by your team'?
6. Would u feel ready to be a leader of a small group who
have selected themselves, supporting them as necessary and leading them as
required'?
7. Have u worked collaboratively in small teams which have a
limited life span?
A positive answer to 1 and 2. and any one of 4 to 7 would be
grounds for membership of a team. Question 2 is to help us allocate u to a
team.
When u have thought about these questions. can u contact
Jean and let her know that u wish to participate'? I will then telefone u in
order to establish who the leader of your group will be.
Your initial work will be to expand on and bring definition
to the initial work done by the committee. U will then be asked to test in your
separate sferes of influence how people u know react to ideas implicit in the
Heading with which your team is concerned.
There will be conversations u have which will win people
over and some that do not. Any problems should be raised with your fellow
members and the leader of your team. They will be able to raise these with me,
and I in turn with the committee.
It will be helpful for your team to confer and come up with changes u would look for
over time as signs that your efforts are leading to desirable changes. The committee
will keep u posted on changes that they observe over time, which might be attributed
to your team's work. (I cannot at this point, say what those things are that u
expect to see. I will of course help u where I can.
Back to the top.
On other pages: part 1,
part 2,
part 3,
part 4.
A: Whatever is the SSS's final view of simplifying spelling will receive my support thruout the process of implementation.
B: Implementation is on a gradual (ie, every year) basis of the three (or thereabouts) most important simplifications which have a fonetic basis.
1. Do u enjoy the idea of expanding the ground work on
introducing spelling reform, affecting:
a) The Costs, the saving of the same, or
b) Communicating, media of various kinds, or
c) The Benefits of introducing spelling reforms?
2. In which order would u rate your interest?
3. Do u have email?
4. Would u feel comfortable being part of a team, whom u may never see, but with whom u are in regular contact on a subject of common interest?
5. Can u undertake to report back on limited assignments that test the validity or otherwise of ideas generated by your team'?
6. Would u feel ready to be a leader of a small group who have selected themselves, supporting them as necessary and leading them as required'?
7. Have u worked collaboratively in small teams which have a limited life span?